Tribunal Acquits Tinubu.
A three-man panel of the Code of Conduct Tribunal led by Danladi Yakubu Umar has dismissed the three-count charge brought against former Governor of Lagos State, Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
Tinubu was alleged to have operated and maintained several foreign accounts while in office as the Governor of Lagos State contrary to the provisions of the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act.
In its ruling this morning, the tribunal maintained that the charge did not comply with the provisions of the Act which demands that an accused person should be invited and confronted with allegations against him or her for an opportunity for such an accused person to make a written admission or denial of the allegations before the matter can be transferred to the tribunal for adjudication.
In the course of the trial, the former Lagos State governor had complained to the tribunal that he was neither invited nor summoned by the Code of Conduct Bureau as it did to other governors, to come and make a written admission or denial of the allegations against him.
In agreeing with the former governor, the tribunal held that the provisions of Section 3(d) of the Act is a condition precedent which must be complied with before the tribunal will become vested with jurisdiction to try an accused person.
The tribunal blasted the Federal Government for flouting the provision which the lawmakers inserted in the Act with the intention to avoid overcrowding the tribunal with cases which would have been resolved upon the invitation of an accused person by the Code of Conduct Bureau.
He dismissed the submissions of the Federal Government that it invited Tinubu severally to the bureau without success and noted that there is no evidence before the tribunal to support the claims that Tinubu was ever invited by the Code of Conduct Bureau to make a written admission or denial of the allegations against him before he was dragged to the tribunal.
Furthermore, the tribunal held that the leave he granted to the Federal Government to commence the trial of Tinubu was in relation to an earlier one-count charge filed before the tribunal and not for the three-count charge upon which the trial commenced.
It held that it was an abuse of court process having discontinued with the one-count charge.
It also held that there was no summary proof of evidence attached to the amended three-count charge upon which Tinubu is standing trial.
Consequently, the tribunal quashed the charges brought against the former Lagos State governor and dismissed them.
Tinubu was arraigned before the tribunal on 21 September over allegations of operating foreign accounts while in office as Lagos State governor.
His counsel made up of 10 Senior Advocates of Nigeria and 21 other lawyers objected the efforts of the prosecution led by Alex Izinyon, SAN, to substitute the one-count charge with a fresh three-count charge.
Wole Olanipekun led the team of lawyers representing Tinubu
Addressing reporters after the sitting, Tinubu described his case as political persecution and challenged his accusers to bring proof of his foreign accounts, if they had any.
A three-man panel of the Code of Conduct Tribunal led by Danladi Yakubu Umar has dismissed the three-count charge brought against former Governor of Lagos State, Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
Tinubu was alleged to have operated and maintained several foreign accounts while in office as the Governor of Lagos State contrary to the provisions of the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act.
In its ruling this morning, the tribunal maintained that the charge did not comply with the provisions of the Act which demands that an accused person should be invited and confronted with allegations against him or her for an opportunity for such an accused person to make a written admission or denial of the allegations before the matter can be transferred to the tribunal for adjudication.
In the course of the trial, the former Lagos State governor had complained to the tribunal that he was neither invited nor summoned by the Code of Conduct Bureau as it did to other governors, to come and make a written admission or denial of the allegations against him.
In agreeing with the former governor, the tribunal held that the provisions of Section 3(d) of the Act is a condition precedent which must be complied with before the tribunal will become vested with jurisdiction to try an accused person.
The tribunal blasted the Federal Government for flouting the provision which the lawmakers inserted in the Act with the intention to avoid overcrowding the tribunal with cases which would have been resolved upon the invitation of an accused person by the Code of Conduct Bureau.
He dismissed the submissions of the Federal Government that it invited Tinubu severally to the bureau without success and noted that there is no evidence before the tribunal to support the claims that Tinubu was ever invited by the Code of Conduct Bureau to make a written admission or denial of the allegations against him before he was dragged to the tribunal.
Furthermore, the tribunal held that the leave he granted to the Federal Government to commence the trial of Tinubu was in relation to an earlier one-count charge filed before the tribunal and not for the three-count charge upon which the trial commenced.
It held that it was an abuse of court process having discontinued with the one-count charge.
It also held that there was no summary proof of evidence attached to the amended three-count charge upon which Tinubu is standing trial.
Consequently, the tribunal quashed the charges brought against the former Lagos State governor and dismissed them.
Tinubu was arraigned before the tribunal on 21 September over allegations of operating foreign accounts while in office as Lagos State governor.
His counsel made up of 10 Senior Advocates of Nigeria and 21 other lawyers objected the efforts of the prosecution led by Alex Izinyon, SAN, to substitute the one-count charge with a fresh three-count charge.
Wole Olanipekun led the team of lawyers representing Tinubu
Addressing reporters after the sitting, Tinubu described his case as political persecution and challenged his accusers to bring proof of his foreign accounts, if they had any.
No comments:
Post a Comment